Unanswered Questions, Pitch in your opinion!

[Zenzational]

Hey guys, I'm just curious so here are some questions I have and I would like to see some opinions on these ^-\. People with at least 2 moths playing time recommended prior to answering these

1.) Should the inviter of a troublemaking person that got banned or demoted, be held partially responsible too? Assume that the inviter completely understood the invited person was a nice and mature man.

2.) Is Y-EP still trying to be a private site, or an opened-to public site with all the plans, propositions, and stuff?

3.) What is wrong with predicting future levels on AG lobbies? I think yck tried to remove that feature but looked what happened, now you can't see what the next level is, LOL.

4.) Am I pro? :O

5.) Does using stop-motion, pausing, and in-game chatting make us look like hackers to regular AG lobbies?

Feel free to ask anything you want related to Exit Path!

[Ozone Layer]

The answer is what YOU think! (hippie talk)

[Excitement1000]

Reply to question #4: NO!!! lolnoob

 

[Malkoir]

1. No, people are responsible for their own actions on the site. Just because someone let them in doesn't mean they should be punished too, it's just a screw up on their part.

2. We act like we want to be public but then we are really elitist when it comes to skill in jumping racing, and unfortunately a large portion of the remaning 1.0 EP audience is immature 10 year olds and in here we prefer our people to be mature or we kick them out. We want to be public but we don't want to, its complicated.

3.Makes you appear as if you're hacking the game

4. No

5. Yes but also double jumping makes you look like a hacker to any noobs eyes so I don't think it really matters

[Steinwayartist]

My opinion
1) I think that the person that invited should be warned about being careful about who you invite. And maybe a de (whatever their rank).  

2) I think we should honestly remain private, it is TOO much effort and preparation and we may lose our private site altogether if that happens, so as i say. Better to be safe than sorry.

3) I do not like that idea, i mean it is for safety, and predicting the level was a hint of knowing about yck. So you can still put AG levels just to be safe and not hack the room.

4) i dont know

5) Honesly, if they dont know about yck, yes.  If they do know, then no. They will just have great expectations for an invitation. IMHO, when i would do a double, people would either say "you are a hacker, no one likes you, LEAVE"!  Or
"i know you are yck, can i be invited?"

[Nabbit]

1. Well I invited a troublemaker once. (People don't let me forget about that either. *receives evil eye*) So yeah guys, forgive and forget. Just tell the person to be more careful next time. We can't make in-depth judgements about people after only seeing them once in an 1.0 EP room so it's likely someone will screw up with inviting the wrong type of person often.

2. I guess we're still trying to figure that out.

3. People can report that there's people that are hacking exit path and report it to AG, the last thing we want, because then AG will find out about YckEP. Yck made the next level invisible just for this reason.

4. No me. Obviously.

5. Uh... yeah! O.o Imagine playing EP 3 years ago and someone coming in chatting in-game and using stop-motion. We'd think he's a total freak! xD  But yeah, because of the immaturity level of most people on EP we could do something as simple as double jumping and they'd freak. Expect 8 year olds to freak out over everything.

[dragon144]

1. No. Unless he invite him the 2nd time

2. idk

3. I dont think knowing there is a site called yck is something bad personally but this is his choice maybe he has his own reason why.

4. Well, depends how you want me to answer it?

5. it more looked like lag

[Sponsored content]